<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.insomniaclibrarians.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Insomniac Librarians - Stagnation vs. Dynamic approach - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.insomniaclibrarians.com/node/312</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Stagnation vs. Dynamic approach&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Stagnation vs. Dynamic approach</title>
 <link>http://www.insomniaclibrarians.com/node/312</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;When someone is fixated on a single objective or a node, it hurts. The sheer maths tell us that if 10 of their folks charge the Stables, the most they&#039;re defending with at their nodes is 5. And yet, instead of players picking up and heading out of an obviously losing battle, they&#039;ll stay. They&#039;ll die over, and over, and over again defending a lost cause. There was one occasion where digging in for the long haul actually succeeded, and yea, it is epic. However, the overwhelming amount of times, you&#039;ll lose.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.insomniaclibrarians.com/node/312&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.insomniaclibrarians.com/node/312#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.insomniaclibrarians.com/taxonomy/term/101">Administration</category>
 <category domain="http://www.insomniaclibrarians.com/taxonomy/term/98">All I Really Needed to Know</category>
 <category domain="http://www.insomniaclibrarians.com/taxonomy/term/99">Gaming</category>
 <category domain="http://www.insomniaclibrarians.com/taxonomy/term/100">Libraries</category>
 <category domain="http://www.insomniaclibrarians.com/taxonomy/term/3">Professional Resource</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 06:27:04 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Brooke</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">312 at http://www.insomniaclibrarians.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

